So creating a new repo on GitHub, you get a set of getting started steps. They changed the default branchname to “main” from “master” due to its connotations with slavery.

When I create a new repo now, the initial getting started steps recommend creating a branch named “master” as opposed to “main” as it was a while ago.

It’s especially weird since the line git branch -M master is completely unnecessary, since git init still sets you up with a “master” branch.

Disclaimer: I have a bunch of private repos, and my default branchnames are pretty much all “master”.

Is this a recent change?

Edit: Mystery solved, my default branchname is “master”. Thanks bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone !

  • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Having a magical standard fairy waive a wand isn’t going to fix scripts, or stop them from breaking.

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      What? If there’s an actual standard, it will stop scripts from breaking, because the assumption that master is the main branch will always be true.