The point was that you’re claiming to do research on something just to turn around and say something that WILDLY wrong

I claimed to do research on something very specific. If you have evidence to the contrary, please feel free to prove me wrong instead of just intentionally misrepresenting my statement.

Doesn’t matter if you say simultaneously or not.

…of course it does? A thousand simultaneous streams is not going to have the same load as a dozen…

the instantiation of a session for a torrent is LONG. Like 5s+ long

That’s weird because it works instantly for me.

Buddy, do you not know how periods work? That’s 2 different sentences you’ve mashed together and pretended they were one.

Secondly, I didn’t say simultaneously.

It will scale just fine, so long as the ratio of instances:users is similar.

The current ratio of consumers:creators on youtube is 41:1, by my research. A single server of sufficient power could easily serve thousands of users.

PeerTube uses WebTorrent technology. Each server hosts a torrent tracker and each web browser viewing a video also shares it. This allows to share the load between the server itself and the clients as well as the bandwidth used through P2P technology.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PeerTube

No, it’s the goal of apps that want to serve as many advertisements as humanly possible. Most dating apps don’t have any way to monetize your attention.

Would be totally cool if I wasn’t completely certain that they would use that against me.

Would you rather see 5 or 6 women that all expressed interest in you or a thousand women who have never and probably will never even see you? Open the app, swipe 5 or 6 times, move on with your life.

Who wants men spending hours on the app and why? Most of these are subscription-based, not ad-supported.

Yes, that’s the idea. They wouldn’t see anyone who hasn’t already liked them.

Maybe you missed the headline where this was a new CEO that killed their only unique feature…or the fact that I used the past tense in the comment you replied to.

having the app where the men can’t make a move unless the women contact you? Will not work wtf was she thinking?

I mean, it did work though. It was one of the top dating apps for a long time.

When was the last time Meta cared about what anybody wanted?

You can report these.

…I’m honestly at a complete loss as to what you’re talking about. How what works? What is it you think is happening here? What is it you think I’m lying about?

I definitely remember those things being proposed. I don’t remember them going into effect. Hence the “actually accomplished”. I also remember several companies launching lawsuits to stall the progress. The document you provided says “launched a crackdown on deceptive ‘junk fees’”, not “implemented legislation that banned junk fees”. And “Proposed (not implemented) new ‘click to cancel’ rules”.

With the incoming administration that work is certain to be abandoned. Not saying they didn’t try, just that they weren’t able to be efficient enough to be effective.

No. Not really. I never said anything that remotely resembled that.

What did they actually accomplish? All the anti-trust stuff has just been tied up in courts for years and years. And they gave Apple a pass on their Epic lawsuit, which is a fucking travesty.

It’s all part of the game. Same reason senators constantly introduce bills that they know won’t get passed. So they can say “we tried but the other team refused to pass it”.

🤔