

I took ‘apocalyptic Event’ by its Definition, being a sudden Event that Brings about the Apocalypse. To that regard, the climate crisis is a somewhat slow dead.
I took ‘apocalyptic Event’ by its Definition, being a sudden Event that Brings about the Apocalypse. To that regard, the climate crisis is a somewhat slow dead.
We are currently on track to reach +4.5°C average heat increase above pre-industrials levels in 2100. Which means famines all over the World, only 30% of current agricultural Land left for Farming, and wild fires being a common occurence up to the 50th latitude. And Not being able to Go outside in Summer for Most of the World, because our availability to sweat will be hindered by high humidity levels, leaving most people of the Population left for a high Chance to Heat strokes.
All of that assuming our current scientific Models are not lacking behind the reality, as with the recent sharp increase over +1,5°C in 2023-2024, we can not yet completely explain yet. So it could be worse than that, the chances of it being better are almost Zero.
At what Point in time did I say any Thing about Trumps relationship to Israel? Being favorfull to Russia and other states IS possibke, its mit mutually exclusive. Putins Russia could Not have opted Out this easily from the Treaty, because that would have Made hin Look evil in the international Stage. Including towards China. This would have severely impacted His ability to secure funding, munitions and Ressources from other states, which He needed, AS WE now know for a 3-day Invasion of Ukraine. Just for an example for this, See Irans nuclear Programm which resulted in them being almost completely cut Off from the international Stage. So yes, Trump did do Putin a favor, shifting the blame from existing the Treaty to a manical narcisist and President of the US.
Explain to me then how abolishing a Treaty solely between Russia and US that was forged in 1989, when China as a nuclear Power wasnt such a Thing, has had any positive effect in regards to the US Relation to China or the Rest of the World. He Said, it was BC of China, thats clearly just an excuse. france and UK already were nuclear Powers in 1989, but were not part of this Treaty, why do you think that was? If you want to forge a new Treaty with another country (i.e. China), you forge it with them bilaterally between China and US, not by abolishing existing Treaties. No one would Stop you from having multiple Treaties, honestly. Aside from the fact that those already exist.
If you can not See that this was purely to the benefit of Russia and Putin, then to what purpose was it?
Its not about going Out of your way to antagonize a foreign Nation, that was already Made 70 years ago with the Cold War. But reducing those Treaties and being apologetic about foreign nations treating of free speech and freedom in General with No positive Effect to your own Country or the international Stage at large does Not make you Look strong or in any way interested in your own countries welfare, it makes you Look weak and in that countries Pocket. Whether He IS in Chinas Pocket or Not, you can decide for yourself, following the Link given by me on His foreign policies.
Europe will defend their interests, as we have always done (you can see on my instance, that i am Not a US Citizen, do you?). Before Trump, we we’re of the opinion that our and your interests align as the Western Democratic World, making positive Change for all of us. This Changes more and more with what a fuck-show of an Impression Trumps US has given us. With what His current ramblings are, Thinking, that you can Change Goalposts in a partnership singlehandedly (i.e. NATOs, Not the United States, requirements for 3% GDP Military spending to 5%), Shows clearly, that He does Not consider the Rest of the Democratic World AS Partners, but adversaries.
Honestly, whatever you wrote, did Not once answer my requests for explaining to me your Points? I answered your questions in regards to Finance and spending, you are Just ignoring those Things. Not being able to talking Things Out with me makes me think you are a Troll, not a Person interested in Civil discourse and discussion.
A real subject? CS Easy with what my Job ist, especialy the explaining it to the Client Part - and i am Not a Programer or Developer but Specialized in IT-Service and Consulting
A made-up subject? Democratic Literacy Critical Thinking, democratic Processes and the learnings from History All-Over-the-world made to improve and strengthen Democracy to the Pupils. In my opinion its the Most important Thing that Kids can be taught right now.
Please explain to me how his Ukraine-Russia Peace plan had any financial effect ion the US finances? Because there was None.
Or withdrawing from the nuclear forces Treaty Or the russia-syria collaboration. In that regard, it cost the US more Money, because they increased their presence in that Region.
If you Check the article i linked, it is already stated in the begining “Upon taking office, Trump relied more on military personnel than any previous administration” - what do you think, how that Military Personal in foreign affairs is getting paid?
And it is a fact, that his government was one with the biggest deficits on governmentla spending in decades.
Sure, here is a quick summary of what he did do in the First term:
I could go on , as those are the Points to His presidential term until the begining of 2019, leaving one year of His presidency Out. But you too can ready them yourself: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_policy_of_the_first_Donald_Trump_administration
Basic TLDR; his presidential term on terms of foreign policies saw a Retreat of the US from international policies and democratic oversight, thereby allowing russia to Take a bigger Part on influecing the international Stage and foreign states in authoritarean ways
Boy, do i have to Break a Leg to you - what do you think Putin is doing with Trump? Even through Israel-USA relationship is deep, do not underestimate, how deep Putin is utilizing his pet dog Trump (i do not want to make this more graphic than necessary).
I don’t think thats really possible. One of the reasons why we have a hard time figuring Out how to get CO2 Out of the atmosphere is because chemically its such non reaction Gas. This stuff interacts with almost nothing and if it reacts (as in being bound to Saccharose and Cellulose in Plants), its always requiring somewhat large amounts of external Energy. So neither technology Nor bilogy will save us