All that censorship, yet they could not be bothered to replace ChatGPT with deepseek in their stolen training data 😄

Can it generate images of Winnie the Pooh?

Gilderoy?

That’s not exactly a high bar

It’s not about why owns it. It’s about where young people can be without getting bothered by their parents and other old people.

Well, inside that text generator lies useful information, as well as misinformation of course, because it has been trained on exactly that. Does it make shit up? Absolutely. But so do and did a lot of google or bing search results, even prior to the AI-slop-content farm era.

And besides that, it is a fancy text generator that can use tools, such as searching bing (in case of ChatGPT) and summarizing search results. While not 100% accurate the summaries are usually fairly good.

In my experience the combination of information in the LLM, web search and asking follow up questions and looking at the sources gives better and much faster results than sifting though search results manually.

As long as you don’t take the first reply as gospel truth (as you should not do with the first google or bing result either) and you apply the appropriate amount of scrutiny based on the importance of your questions (as you should always do), ChatGPT is far superior to a classic web search. Which is, of course, where media literacy matters.

No. Learn to become media literate. Just like looking at the preview of the first google result is not enough blindly trusting LLMs is a bad idea. And given how shitty google has become lately ChatGPT might be the lesser of two evils.

I didn’t. Have been wondering about „what if“ ever since. So save yourself some grief and do it.

Its 100€ if you can not prove that any harm was done. It could be more with proof (ie spam call logs etc)

There is no gray. Only black and white!

Says who? ChatGPT?