• cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 minutes ago

      They lost it in CPUs, but I think they’re actually nailing it in GPUs though (for once(at least for the budget/entry level))

  • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    48 minutes ago

    You don’t need to buy an entire company to control or profit from it… He’s really that dumb isn’t he. He could do the whole Black Rock thing and control every company in the world, instead he has this idea of just owning everything.

    I’m starting to suspect the price speculation of things he owns is by his own hand, nothing to do with the market whatsoever.

  • kurcatovium@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Let’s hope it’s just another wccftech article pulled out of author’s anus…

        • DSTGU@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          49 minutes ago

          To me x86 is currently in similar position to internal combustion engine cars. We are already almost certain some of the alternatives available right now are better.

          The reason ICE/x86 seem better is that they have the benefit of being greatly optimised due to years of market dominance pulling billions if not trillions of dollars into research. Some company has to sacrifice a lot of money to get the ball rolling on new tech as it is very difficult for an emerging technology to break old tech dominance. However considering Apple seems to be pulling similar numbers on a way less developed architecture I d say we might be close.

          • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            34 minutes ago

            I don’t know enough about the subjects to go into details, but I know enough to say that that is reductive. ARM/alternatives are not inherently better, at least not universally. And, especially because of the inertia, I do not expect x86 to be fully replaced on the desktop any time soon. The motivations behind companies such as Apple using ARM likely have more to do with licensing than anything else

            It’s probably more useful to think of x86 and ARM as slightly different tools that are slightly better suited to different tasks. Desktop, server (and possibly high-performance) computing are x86’s specialty, and I do not expect it to be replaced

            All-in-all, from what I know, the practical differences between ARM and x86 are nowhere near large enough to be compared to something like the electric vs internal combustion engine. It’s probably closer to a difference of, say, a typical train and a subway

            But, please read up on this yourself. I am not an expert in hardware, this is just what i casually picked up as a layperson

  • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Everyone is focusing on Musk but uh, Global Foundries wants to be involved in buying Intel?

    The same Global Foundries that’s utterly incapable of progressing their tech stack?

    The one AMD created when they got rid of their foundries and was happy to do so?

    That amuses the shit out of me.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      46 minutes ago

      AMD wasn’t quite “happy” to sell their fabs, it was necessitated because they were facing bankruptcy. People forget but the prevailing opinion was that AMD was going to bankrupt within a few years.

      Their pre-Su CEO, Rory Read, often gets shit online for being there during a bad period, but he made some difficult and necessary decisions that saved AMD. Part of that was the GF selloff.

      I highly doubt Global Foundries is even in the position to buy Intel, they’d most likely want to give them a cash infusion in exchange for tech or for selling fabs (which intel would probably accept, since their fabs are currently under-utilised… in other words they have too much capacity, and yet are still building more because Chips Act says they have to). That would be good for GF.

      • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yeah.

        And there’s a very good chance that Elon spends his waning years in and out of every court, trying to stay out of jail.

        Source: Rockefeller’s biography.

        And that’s actually the optimistic version, from Elon’s perspective. There’s been plenty of rich assholes in history that didn’t have to worry about the courts.

        • TheFogan@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I mean really depends whether or not he manages to continue to succesfully own the US government. He made basically statements along the lines of if trump loses the election he could go to jail. I assume he’s betting on either the trump administration killing democracy… or being able to buy the next election too. Or perhaps just often enough that the supreme court never gets fixed.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Not doing to happen in this political climate. The robber barons has nothing in the tech companies.

    • Venator@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      He hasn’t bought it yet, maybe everyone else will stay buying Intel stocks after this news and it’ll get too expensive for him.

  • EvilBit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    179
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    No responsible board should sell as much as a paper clip to this sociopathic weenis piss baby.

    • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      31 minutes ago

      What? It worked out for Twitter shareholders though.

      What bothers me about all these political posts is when people act surprised when profit seeking people act purely in their self interest.

      I agree it’s bad, but it’s weird to be constantly mad about things so obvious like parasites acting parasitically.

    • breakingcups@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      76
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Now give me an example of a corporate board at Intel’s scale being responsible when given the choice between being responsible or buttloads of short-term profits.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Responsible to who?
      Of course they will sell if there’s a profit to be made. Companies exist to make profits, if they can make a profit from it, it’s actually their responsibility to the shareholders to do it.

      Maybe you mean responsible in some way that has to do with morals, but if you think morals apart from staying within the law, have any say in this whatsoever, you are being very naive. That’s not at all how the system works.

      That said I don’t see any other way than corruption for Musk to be interested. Musk buys Intel, and Trump doubles the subsidies to Intel and give them extra sweet government contracts. And everybody profit, except the stupid taxpayers including those that voted Trump.

      Only the law helps super capitalist narcissists to stay at least somewhat within moral norms.
      And in USA the law doesn’t even count anymore. So there you go, everything is fucked up, until Americans figure it out. Which means it will be fucked up for a loooong time.

  • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Look at the way Tesla collects and treats customer data, and the way Musk seems to unilaterally abuse his control over the companies he owns for personal reasons.

    Now think about the capabilities of the Intel Management Engine that pretty much every Intel CPU requires.

    Bad vibes, I say.

    For those feeling out of the loop, see here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Management_Engine

    Tldr - it’s a little always on processor, running a Minix OS, with direct access to all board devices including the Ethernet Controller.

    AMD has something similar in form of their Platform Security Processor.

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    6 hours ago

    On one hand “noooo!” But on the other this would be great for ARM and RISC-v if Intel tanks.

    • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Screw ARM honestly, they don’t need any help. RISC-V though as the only open source of any significance, absolutely!

      • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        What about POWER9? You can buy a complete workstation right now, with an open source CPU, Board, BIOS. It’ll cost you an arm, a leg, and probably some more internal organs, but it is currently more functional than RISC-V.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        45 minutes ago

        Technically it’s a third party developing a Framework board. Regardless, it’s cool that other companies even can design Framework boards.

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Hooray for Risc-v, anyway.

      I think I joke too often about ruling benevolently over the world’s robots someday after everyone lays off their Cybersecurity staff.

      But if we continue this trend, this community may have the only clean secure laptops after everyone else sells out and fills their shit with backdoors.

      Maybe we can rule together as a benevolent collective…