cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/46655413

The Mozilla Foundation, the non-profit arm of the Firefox browser maker Mozilla, has laid off 30% of its employees as the organization says it faces a “relentless onslaught of change.”

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      If Mozilla does become defunct, it does raise the question of whether Chrome would be considered a Google monopoly, and therefore subject to antitrust legislation.

      I can’t imagine any governments would look kindly upon internet access being guarded behind a single company’s product.

      • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Google should be subject to antitrust legislation regardless.

        Their position as a monopoly is what enables this.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        I can’t imagine any governments would look kindly upon internet access being guarded behind a single company’s product.

        laughs in 2001

      • ravhall@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        There is a new browser based on WebKit (safari), called Orion that looks promising. However, it’s only on macOS and iOS at this point. Hopefully Linux and Android will be a consideration at some point.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          There’s also a new browser based on Firefox/Gecko called Zen. There’s way too many browsers based on Webkit or Blink.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Chrome’s engine was originally forked from WebKit. That makes them too similar (even years later) for WebKit to count as a real alternative.

          • ravhall@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            The point is to leave a google controlled ecosystem… which means it counts as a valid alternative. What would you suggest besides chromium and gecko?

      • WldFyre@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Splitting Chrome from Google wouldn’t make Chrome not a monopoly, though, right?

        • T156@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          The split might leave a monopoly still, if it’s the only major browser.

          • ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            It would be a lot easier to compete with though, since Google couldn’t treat it as a loss leader that still bring them in search revenue by default.

      • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Let’s just separate GOOG from Chrome / Chromium and Google Search completely. So that the direction of the most used browser, most used search engine and the biggest advertiser don’t circle jerk each other.